Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:54:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:53:59 -0400 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:14861 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:53:59 -0400 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200208091457.g79EvYr70722@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid() To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:57:33 -0400 (EDT) Cc: acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan), cmadams@hiwaay.net (Chris Adams), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Aug 09, 2002 10:59:00 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 924 Lines: 24 Rik van Riel writes: > On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > >> I almost put 99999, but then I realized that that's silly. >> For years Linux had a hard limit of about 4000 processes, > > That limit was removed some 2 years ago. Sure. Linux is 11 years old now. Also remember that that was the _hard_ limit. We had a soft limit near 1000, with a kernel recompile needed to increase it. Almost everybody was satisfied with this. Personally I'd change my adjustable PID limit to 999, but I wouldn't suggest that as a default. 9999 should cover almost all systems. Self-adjusting could be nice. Then everybody starts with 9, and gains a digit whenever space is 50% full. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/