Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761096Ab2EIUi2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 16:38:28 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:49701 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022Ab2EIUi0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 16:38:26 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Organization: Linaro Limited To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/19] Introduce a led trigger for CPU activity and consolidate LED driver in ARM Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:38:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.4.0-rc3; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Bryan Wu , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rpurdie@rpsys.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, tim.gardner@canonical.com, Olof Johansson References: <1335884506-15370-1-git-send-email-bryan.wu@canonical.com> <20120509122436.1b612004.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120509122436.1b612004.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205092038.16722.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:OKfBd1uPZCEaS/jOVdAPuA9jXdAnyT81v+/2rIZhII+ wR2wKaQZMZiLn0+47oK2hiYxFeM4/7brj3Mo+F1a5CTIdWKyQ5 X+Mk6x3CYJDfZKBnSnxGT6lMN2Oi6jl0UVdw0Gl7HzRH9iSTnP uxZ77ITgAaSFeGj7JcXJ+wuoIOb1vFIDDtA4hdzoXPlfrkknl4 uiz6U3ew4J7zX/EsUzYSbHCozNLRzH147ckCFzdVPTPtq9CVPd 582x8RCYdX7eQuEnSIgdtuY2NBsHYG2cRFIsjoSM5QaH9ziROa fKhKgMdkdmtIOu/5OmKrrLZrFnRQDhJ+PHt1y7zKDAm+xhzgtD Jwm5RuQOzv4TI8SKnBF5IFYZGsF1Ep6XGU5K71hzX Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 21 On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > I'm the LEDs patchmonkey at present. I can merge the drivers/leds > change if you like, but there doesn't seem much point in that unless > all the other patches get merged. > > So my preferred approach would be for the patch series to get merged > via some ARM tree. I'm fine with taking it through arm-soc if that helps. In the long run, it would be nice to have a proper maintainer for this again after Richard more or less stepped down from that position. Given that Bryan has shown that he's persistent enough to get this patch series to v9, how about making him the primary maintainer for the entire subsystem? He should know a lot about it already. Bryan? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/