Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986Ab2EJFHe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 01:07:34 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:23338 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501Ab2EJFHd (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 01:07:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="141231681" Message-ID: <4FAB4CBF.3060604@intel.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:06:07 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Peter Zijlstra , mgorman@suse.de, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jeremy@goop.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, glommer@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, luto@mit.edu, avi@redhat.com, len.brown@intel.com, dhowells@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, borislav.petkov@amd.com, yinghai@kernel.org, cpw@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, rientjes@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, trenn@suse.de, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] TLB flush optimization References: <1336485790-30902-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1336489319.16236.43.camel@twins> <20120509234512.GA27196@tassilo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20120509234512.GA27196@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 749 Lines: 27 On 05/10/2012 07:45 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> Have you tried what happens if you get rid of the funny multi-vector-ipi >> scheme and use the generic smp_call functions? > > Yes we did. It's much faster on larger systems. > > But haven't sent the patch yet because wasn't sure if it wasn't slower > on small systems. Why you worried about the small system? are there some bad example there? It should be helpful after multiple invlpg enabled. I like to take a look this later. :) > > -Andi > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/