Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:47:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:47:59 -0400 Received: from e.kth.se ([130.237.48.5]:11793 "EHLO elixir.e.kth.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:47:58 -0400 To: martin@bruli.net Cc: o.pitzeier@uptime.at, ghoz@sympatico.ca, france@handhelds.org, Jay.Estabrook@compaq.com, pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5.26 - arch/alpha References: <002b01c23279$84be70a0$1211a8c0@pitzeier.priv.at> <3D53AEF8.16231.E49799D@localhost> From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: 09 Aug 2002 19:51:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Martin Brulisauer"'s message of "Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:00:56 +0200" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 846 Lines: 16 "Martin Brulisauer" writes: > Did anybody use gcc-3.0.x or gcc-3.1? With gcc-3.0.4 I > successfully built 2.4.18 but some applications don't run > correctly (eg. MySQL -> Parser). Is the kernel compilable > with gcc-3.1? Today I am using gcc-2.95.3 and I think is > ok; better than egcs (generates less unaligned traps at > runtime without changing the source). I've been using gcc 3.1 to compile kernel for a while (since it was released). I don't have any problems with 2.4.18 and upward. I don't remember which compiler I used previously. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@users.sf.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/