Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:05:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:05:00 -0400 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:42408 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:04:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Announce: daily 2.5 BK snapshots From: Paul Larson To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Jeff Garzik , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1505209847.1028881191@[10.10.2.3]> References: <1028903778.19435.348.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com> <1505209847.1028881191@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 09 Aug 2002 14:03:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1028919780.22405.353.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1020 Lines: 20 On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 10:19, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Personally, I'd love to see the *changes* in what passed and failed > posted every day - the whole result set is obviously too big. The > quicker people know what's wrong, the quicker it gets fixed, before > we build more on top of an unstable foundation. Right, that's the plan. If something changes from one day to the next, then it will be submitted immediatly. Right now I'm in that stage of building a "stable" foundation. It could probably use some tweaking to the .config and other things to introduce a higher likelyhood of finding problems from one day to the next, but I don't want to be constantly just finding things that everyone is already aware of. Any suggestions wrt this are welcome. -Paul Larson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/