Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:24:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:24:15 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:15116 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:24:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:27:43 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Bill Davidsen cc: lkml Subject: Re: Linux v2.4.19-rc5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 967 Lines: 28 On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > Sure, glad to. If the 2.5 numbers are much worse than 2.4, somthing > > > isn't working as well, > > > > Are you volunteering to identify that "something" for us ? > > Hell no. I was simply commenting that there is some general qualitative > information available from those numbers, even if it is hard to quantify > them. As long as there is nobody to interpret what the dbench numbers actually mean, why are we treating them as the most important thing around ? ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/