Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:15:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:15:30 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:30220 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:15:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Rik van Riel cc: , Daniel Phillips , , , David Mosberger , "David S. Miller" , , , William Lee Irwin III , Subject: Re: large page patch (fwd) (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 23 On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > To further this point, by how much has the security number > of Linux improved as a result of the inclusion of the Linux > Security Module framework ? ;) > > I'm sure even Linus will agree that the security potential > has increased, even though he can't measure or quantify it. Actually, the security number is irrelevant to me - the "noise index" from people who think security protocols are interesting is what drove that patch (and that one is definitely measurable). This way, the security noise is now in somebody elses court ;) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/