Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:19:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:19:04 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:55052 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:19:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:23:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Paul Larson cc: Hubertus Franke , Rik van Riel , Andries Brouwer , Andrew Morton , , Dave Jones , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid() In-Reply-To: <1028921658.19434.365.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 24 On 9 Aug 2002, Paul Larson wrote: > > I suspect that it would actually require more than just this. There are various /proc paths, Andries had a full patch at some point a long time ago. My point was not so much that this is sufficient, but that the approach is valid. I'd rather go with the simple approach (that solves two problems) than with a much more complex approach (that solves only one). And yes, I doubt I actually want to give all 30 bits to pid space in the long run (the per-node pid space argument is still valid), but it's better to start with 30 bits and actively trying to break things and then phasing it down later than to be timid and never even see the stuff that breaks. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/