Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 05:47:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 05:47:44 -0400 Received: from aba.krakow.pl ([62.233.163.30]:55460 "HELO two.aba.krakow.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 05:47:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:51:26 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Krawczyk To: zhengchuanbo Cc: "linux-kernel @ vger. kernel. org" Subject: Re: about the tuning of eepro100 Message-ID: <20020810095126.GF21239@aba.krakow.pl> References: <200208101742654.SM00824@zhengcb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200208101742654.SM00824@zhengcb> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 24 On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 05:38:39PM +0800, zhengchuanbo wrote: > so i think the limit is at the eepro100 card. is there any way to improve the throughput? or someone got a higher throughput then that? > the eepro100 chip is 82559. Use e100 driver from Intel [1] with the following parameters: insmod e100.o BundleSmallFr=1 IntDelay=0x600 ucode=1 Intel's driver supports all the interrupt saving features (interrupt delay and small packet bundling) present in EEPro/100 cards. The driver is now GPL, so it should get back to the mainstream kernel. [1] http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df/Detail_Desc.asp?ProductID=417&DwnldID=2896 -- Pawe? Krawczyk, Krak?w, Poland http://echelon.pl/kravietz/ crypto: http://ipsec.pl/ horses: http://kabardians.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/