Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.mail.ru ([194.67.57.11]:62226 "EHLO mx1.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:17:09 -0400 From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure? Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 192.168.231.142 via proxy [80.79.67.2] Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 Reply-To: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 874 Lines: 27 Regarding the list of planned changes for 2.5 i found that nothing is announced regarding DRI/DRM infrastructure. So i wonder whether the current situation is enough satisfactory, or is it just that nobody is interested in such kind of developement? Anyhow the current situation looks a bit odd, because we basically have support for a quite narrow diapasone of 3D accelerators. Does it look like the current interface could be not enough mature? (Note: this message is intended to catalyse a fruitful discussion. hint, hint...) --- cheers, Samium Gromoff__________________ ________________ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/