Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754393Ab2ENDbU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2012 23:31:20 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:18069 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162Ab2ENDbT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2012 23:31:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="99661619" From: "Du, ChangbinX" To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" CC: "mina86@mina86.com" , "Fleming, Matt" , "balbi@ti.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] testusb: using real device-nodes managed by udev instead of using usbfs Thread-Topic: [PATCH 2/3] testusb: using real device-nodes managed by udev instead of using usbfs Thread-Index: AQHNL1p/cPl9Qq41ikap8bVWXEqTwJbEa8gQgAA01ACABAJikA== Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 03:31:14 +0000 Message-ID: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A062A08@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A060D0C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20120511220920.GD13675@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120511220920.GD13675@kroah.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 25 I am sorry I haven't consider of that. I just want testusb tool can work with default option since path /dev/bus/usb exists on most computer, not /proc/bus/usb. So, if I just add /dev/bus/usb to the default search path, is it ok? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 6:09 AM To: Du, ChangbinX Cc: mina86@mina86.com; Fleming, Matt; balbi@ti.com; hpa@zytor.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] testusb: using real device-nodes managed by udev instead of using usbfs On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:02:01AM +0000, Du, ChangbinX wrote: > As the usbfs functionality have replaced by real device-nodes managed by udev whose nodes lived in /dev/bus/usb for a long time, testusb tool need update correspondingly. Why? Is this causing problems as it is today? > Because udev path is fixed, so the "-A" option no longer need and it is removed. Did you just break scripts that was using that option? That's not nice, and not acceptable. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/