Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754923Ab2ENHlx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 03:41:53 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54048 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754483Ab2ENHlw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 03:41:52 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: B9O00TE7+bvgCYCxa2XnLIsG7yaEVaGBfnDYJT43skyG 1336981311 Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 00:41:49 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Chris Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Integrating a new programming language into the kernel Message-ID: <20120514074149.GA12756@kroah.com> References: <20120513120009.18cb3e17@linux-j2xc> <4FB05533.5010807@zytor.com> <20120514135731.2e989a81@linux-j2xc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120514135731.2e989a81@linux-j2xc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 17 On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:57:31PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote: > I'm curious as to why you suggest "no"? > > And if it were to successfully eventuate and I were to do this, it > would only ever be a custom kernel. And that's why I'm curious as to > why you say to not do it. Try it and find out why he, and others, recommend not to do so :) Best of luck, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/