Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754166Ab2ENNkH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 09:40:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:34540 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751027Ab2ENNkF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 09:40:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB10B31.7080207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:40:01 -0500 From: Rob Herring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Turquette CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Thierry Reding , Mike Turquette , Sascha Hauer , Grant Likely , shawn.guo@linaro.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: add DT clock binding support References: <1334003101-17274-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1334003101-17274-4-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20120501225900.GC17311@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120501225900.GC17311@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1525 Lines: 35 On 05/01/2012 05:59 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > On 20120409-15:25, Rob Herring wrote: >> From: Grant Likely > snip >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt | 117 ++++++++++++++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt | 22 +++ >> drivers/clk/clk.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 77 +++++++++++ >> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 14 ++ >> include/linux/clk.h | 19 +++ >> 6 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt > > Hi Rob, > > Patches 1 & 2 are trivial and certainly aimed at clk-next, so I've taken > them in. This patch is a bit more difficult as it touches the common > clk code, clkdev/clk.h and some DT docs. > > Are you looking for me to take this patch into clk-next? I'm just > trying to avoid any more clk dependency issues than we already have... > I think that makes the most sense as it appears I'm dependent on clk-next now. I'm rebasing my patches on clk-next now. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/