Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966352Ab2EOWbn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 18:31:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:56738 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965977Ab2EOWbk (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 18:31:40 -0400 References: <1336798797-8724-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> <1337114622-11292-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1337114622-11292-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Fix CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag validation in clk_set_rate(). From: Richard Zhao Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:31:23 +0800 To: Saravana Kannan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mike Turquette , Paul Walmsley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Rob Herring , Mark Brown , Russell King CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Jeremy Kerr , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergman , Jamie Iles , Magnus Damm , Linus Walleij , Stephen Boyd , Amit Kucheria , Deepak Saxena , Grant Likely Message-ID: <258a747f-c7d8-4f15-8446-2c18fe21ccf3@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1904 Lines: 60 Saravana Kannan wrote: >The clk_set_rate() code shouldn't check the clock's enable count when >validating CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag since the enable count could change >after >the validation. Similar to clk_set_parent(), it should instead check >the >prepare count. The prepare count should go to zero only when the end >user >expects the clock to not be enabled in the future. Since the code >already >grabs the prepare count before validation, it's not possible for >prepare >count to change after validation and by association not possible for a >well >behaving end user to enable the clock while the set rate is in >progress. > >Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan >--- >Please let me know if you don't want me to directly email or CC you in >my >clock related patches. I don't want to spam anyone. Also, let me know >if >you want me add you to my standard list of people to cc in my clock >patches. > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c >index 09b9112..f5b9d3c 100644 >--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c >+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c >@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long >rate) > if (rate == clk->rate) > goto out; > >- if ((clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE) && __clk_is_enabled(clk)) { >+ if ((clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE) && clk->prepare_count) { The condition becomes more strict. Looks good. > ret = -EBUSY; > goto out; > } >-- >1.7.8.3 > >Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora >Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/