Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964806Ab2EPBqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 21:46:24 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.111]:47728 "EHLO LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932344Ab2EPBqW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 21:46:22 -0400 X-AuditID: 9c93016f-b7cecae000000e00-07-4fb306e9685a From: Namhyung Kim To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Cong Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hyeoncheol Lee , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Kprobes as a module? References: <87zk99zwb8.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <4FB2146E.20101@gmail.com> <87vcjxzvtn.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <4FB24991.1040500@hitachi.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:44:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: <4FB24991.1040500@hitachi.com> (Masami Hiramatsu's message of "Tue, 15 May 2012 21:18:25 +0900") Message-ID: <8762bwew79.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1577 Lines: 45 Hi, On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:18:25 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > No, actually you can't make it as a module. There are > two major reasons. > - ftrace depends on the kprobes now. > - int3 handling routine is deeply depends on > the architecture. This includes text modifying code. > > Thus, if you separate the kprobes into module, that means > you need to expose more ugly interface of self modifying > for kernel modules. > I see. > (2012/05/15 17:34), Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:31:42 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On 05/15/2012 04:24 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Probably a dumb question :). >>>> What prevents the kprobes from being built as a module? We want to use >>>> the kprobes on our systems, but some guys worried about potential >>>> security problems. So it'd be great if we can enable/load kprobes as >>>> needed and then disable/unload after using it. Is it a possible senario? > > BTW, I'm not sure what the potential security problems on that? > kprobes itself can be used only from kernel modules(except ftrace). > If someone compromises kernel with kernel module, he doesn't need > kprobes at all. They just can do anything they want. :) > Nevermind, it seems they just worried about what they don't know exactly. Anyway, thanks for your answer. Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/