Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967421Ab2EPLFz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:05:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17426 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966952Ab2EPLFu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:05:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:05:16 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Gilad Ben-Yossef Cc: Christoph Lameter , majianpeng , linux-mm , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all Message-ID: <20120516070516.406b2492@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: References: <201205111008157652383@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4073 Lines: 100 On Sun, 13 May 2012 09:53:15 +0300 Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Didn't I already ack this before? > > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter > > > > Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and > Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess. > > I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces > the bug that this patch by Majianpeng fixes (and also LKML). > > This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking > slub. What's the best way to go about that? > > Thanks! > Gilad > > > On Fri, 11 May 2012, majianpeng wrote: > > > >> Subject: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all > >> > >> Find some kernel message like: > >> SLUB raid5-md127: kmem_cache_destroy called for cache that still has objects. > >> Pid: 6143, comm: mdadm Tainted: G           O 3.4.0-rc6+        #75 > >> Call Trace: > >> [] kmem_cache_destroy+0x328/0x400 > >> [] free_conf+0x2d/0xf0 [raid456] > >> [] stop+0x41/0x60 [raid456] > >> [] md_stop+0x1a/0x60 [md_mod] > >> [] do_md_stop+0x74/0x470 [md_mod] > >> [] md_ioctl+0xff/0x11f0 [md_mod] > >> [] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > >> [] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > >> [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > >> [] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > >> [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >> > >> Then using kmemleak can found those messages: > >> unreferenced object 0xffff8800b6db7380 (size 112): > >>   comm "mdadm", pid 5783, jiffies 4294810749 (age 90.589s) > >>   hex dump (first 32 bytes): > >>     01 01 db b6 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  .....N.......... > >>     ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 98 40 4a 82 ff ff ff ff  .........@J..... > >>   backtrace: > >>     [] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50 > >>     [] kmem_cache_alloc+0xeb/0x1b0 > >>     [] kmem_cache_open+0x2f1/0x430 > >>     [] kmem_cache_create+0x158/0x320 > >>     [] setup_conf+0x649/0x770 [raid456] > >>     [] run+0x68b/0x840 [raid456] > >>     [] md_run+0x529/0x940 [md_mod] > >>     [] do_md_run+0x18/0xc0 [md_mod] > >>     [] md_ioctl+0xba8/0x11f0 [md_mod] > >>     [] blkdev_ioctl+0xd8/0x7a0 > >>     [] block_ioctl+0x3b/0x40 > >>     [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x560 > >>     [] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xa0 > >>     [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >>     [] 0xffffffffffffffff > >> > >> This bug introduced by Commit a8364d5555b2030d093cde0f0795.The > >> commit did not include checks for per cpu partial pages being present on a > >> cpu. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: majianpeng > >> --- > >>  mm/slub.c |    2 +- > >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > >> index ffe13fd..6fce08f 100644 > >> --- a/mm/slub.c > >> +++ b/mm/slub.c > >> @@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ static bool has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info) > >>       struct kmem_cache *s = info; > >>       struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu); > >> > >> -     return !!(c->page); > >> +     return c->page || c->partial; > >>  } > >> > >>  static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s) > >> > > > FWIW, this patch fixed a similar warning that I was seeing on module unload with cifs.ko. I agree it would be good to get it in for 3.4... Tested-by: Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/