Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760253Ab2EPSbT (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 14:31:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43036 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760053Ab2EPSbR (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 14:31:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:20:58 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Avi Kivity , gleb@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] kvm: host side for eoi optimization Message-ID: <20120516172058.GA22861@amt.cnet> References: <42ba7beaa25855997e02fea91a11c9224c51720e.1337168687.git.mst@redhat.com> <20120516154940.GA20549@amt.cnet> <20120516162247.GA10676@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120516162247.GA10676@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2246 Lines: 67 On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 07:22:47PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:49:40PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > @@ -1245,9 +1306,20 @@ int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > int vector = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu); > > > struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic; > > > > > > - if (vector == -1) > > > + /* Detect interrupt nesting and disable EOI optimization */ > > > + if (pv_eoi_enabled(vcpu) && vector == -2) > > > + pv_eoi_clr_pending(vcpu); > > > + > > > + if (vector < 0) > > > > With interrupt window exiting, the guest will exit: > > > > - as soon as it sets RFLAGS.IF=1 and there is any > > interrupt pending in IRR. > > - any new interrupt is set in IRR will kick vcpu > > out of guest mode and recalculate interrupt-window-exiting. > > > > Doesnt this make this bit unnecessary ? > > Looks like we could cut it out. But I'm not sure how architectural it is > that we exit on interrupt window. > I guess there are reasons to exit on interrupt window but > isn't it better to make the feature independent of it? Hum... not sure. Is it helpful for the Hyper-V interface? > This almost never happens in my testing anyway, so > however we handle it is unlikely to affect performance. It decreases the amount of state that must be maintained. BTW there is a bug covered by interrupt window exiting: vcpu0 host - irr 5 set - isr 5 set, irr 5 cleared - eoi_skip bit not set, no other bit set in irr. - enter guest irr 4 set kick vcpu0 out of guest mode - eoi pending bit not set (previous interrupt injection still pending) - skip eoi If it were not for interrupt window exiting, this would inject vector 4 on an unrelated exit who knows how long in the future. Also note optimization depends on the fact that the host kicks vcpu out unconditionally (so it is dependent on certain kvm implementation details). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/