Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965407Ab2EPTry (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 15:47:54 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:21716 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964985Ab2EPTrq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 15:47:46 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ae7jbGUt c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=XlIr_nCh6zIA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=W8j2aq1Z49zx_hoCm0sA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1337197665.6724.73.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Remove useless 4 bytes of padding from every event From: Steven Rostedt To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Linus Torvalds , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , David Sharp , Vaibhav Nagarnaik , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:47:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FB401B2.1010906@linux.intel.com> References: <1337175871.6724.46.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4FB401B2.1010906@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1687 Lines: 49 [ Fixes David Sharps email. I have two versions, and picked the broken one :-p ] On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:36 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 5/16/2012 12:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> > >> But this change will break PowerTop v1. Thus my question is, how long do > >> we need to keep this wasted space in the ring buffers to satisfy an out > >> of date tool? > > > > The wasted space seems of limited importance. Depends on who you ask. For you, it's probably of no importance. For someone trying to get as many events as possible, it's of much greater importance. Lack of events in a report is one of the biggest issues we have. Especially for those that are trying to debug an issue and needs as much info as possible. (function tracing sucks up a hell of a lot) But that said, it doesn't go against what you stated. "limited importance". Its importance is limited to a group of people. > > > > More important is to check which distros have the new powertop. > > > > F16 and F17 seem to have powertop-1.98, which I assume is the new > > world order already. But maybe I assume incorrectly. > > this is the one that will break Shh ;-) > > > > > F14 (which I personally still use, since it doesn't have gnome3) is 1.13. > > this one is fine, it does not use perf events at all. Oo oo! We can change it and Linus won't know. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/