Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756758Ab2EQQIY (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2012 12:08:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:52986 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755801Ab2EQQIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2012 12:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB52270.2060505@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:08:16 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: Feng Tang , mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, robert.richter@amd.com, ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf script: Replace "struct thread" with "struct addr_location" as a parameter for "process_event()" References: <1337173155-25780-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <1337173155-25780-2-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <20120517154521.GB2636@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120517154521.GB2636@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1237 Lines: 29 On 5/17/12 9:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:59:14PM +0800, Feng Tang escreveu: >> Both perl and python script start processing events other than trace >> points, and it's useful to pass the resolved symbol and the dso info >> to the event handler in script for better analysis and statistics. >> >> Struct thread is already a member of struct addr_location, using >> addr_location will keep the thread info, while providing additional >> symbol and dso info if exist, so that the script itself doesn't need >> to bother to do the symbol resolving and dso searching work. > > This seems ok. > > David, any objections or suggestions? perf_event__preprocess_sample calls thread__find_addr_map which sets al->thread and the preprocess_sample is invoked prior to process_event, so it should be fine. That said, I would like to test it. Unfortunately I am knee deep debugging some local perf breakage. Give me a couple of days to get back to this. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/