Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762270Ab2EQRt3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2012 13:49:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:47105 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762233Ab2EQRt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2012 13:49:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support From: Christoph Fritz To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Sascha Hauer , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hans J. Koch" , Daniel Mack In-Reply-To: <20120509081306.GK27341@pengutronix.de> References: <20120507141437.GA9636@lovely.krouter> <20120509072239.GG27341@pengutronix.de> <20120509075618.GA4412@lovely.krouter> <20120509081306.GK27341@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:49:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1337276960.4970.4.camel@lovely> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1570 Lines: 36 On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:13 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:22:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote: > > > > This patch adds the mx35 to the supported cpu-families of the > > > > "CPUfreq driver for i.MX CPUs". > > > > > > I'm afraid this has to wait another cycle since you are patching a file > > > that is scheduled to be replaced with common clock framework support. > > > > Has this "scheduled replacement" somewhere (e.g. calendar) been > > marked? So that I can check in the future before editing "scheduled > > files". > > The clock framework conversion has been a hot topic for quite a while > now, but there hasn't been an official note about it outside the list. > I can understand that the occasional linux arm kernel reader is not > aware of it, but we currently have nothing in place to anounce such > things. (Other than feature-removal.txt which seems not very suitable > since no feature is removed, only updated) Is there already a version I can rebase the patch? On your repo at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git I can't find the new clock framework or even a work-in-progress version. Thanks, -- Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/