Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:37:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:37:39 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:57609 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:37:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3D574CD7.DF054D05@zip.com.au> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:51:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-rc5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rik van Riel CC: Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 9/21] batched addition of pages to the LRU References: <3D57449E.4FADF44@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 19 Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > And it only takes one dirty block! Any LRU page which is dirty > > against a blocked queue is like a hand grenade floating > > down a stream [1]. If some innocent task tries to write that > > page it gets DoSed via the request queue. > > This is exactly why we shouldn't wait on dirty pages in > the pageout path. It's not the wait-on-writeback which is the problem. It's the writeout. Perhaps that's what you meant. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/