Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:05:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:05:42 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:15067 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:05:41 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, davej@suse.de Subject: Trivial Patch Policy (trivial@rustcorp.com.au) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:07:05 +1000 Message-Id: <20020812020958.93C7B2C07A@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2207 Lines: 50 Hi all, I've been collecting trivial patches for a few months now, and it's time to solidify some rules: 1) Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following to be accepted: a) Spelling fixes (useful for grep, and sets a good example) b) Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad) c) Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct) d) Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things) e) Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region). f) Contact detail and documentation fixes g) Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific, since people copy, as long as it's trivial) h) Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey in re-transmission mode) They must also be "trivial" by my definition of trivial. Best patches contain enough context for me to judge without opening the file (diff -C -u is your friend). NOTE: This means I'll only take whitespace/indentation fixes from the author or maintainer. 2) The patch will not be forwarded to anyone until a new kernel has been released after I receive the patch, *unless* noone else is sent the patch. So if you cc: the trivial patch monkey, it'll only be forwarded from there if it doesn't make the next kernel. 3) The first time the patch is forwarded, it will be sent to the author and/or maintainer. If they say they've included it in their tree, no more forwards will occur (modulo some timeout eventually). If they NAK it, the patch will be closed. Otherwise, the patch will be sent directly to Linus or Marcelo on future forwards (the maintainer will still be cc'd). Hopefully this will be a good compromise between coordinating with maintainers who want control of their files, and stopping trivial patches from slipping through the cracks. Cheers! Rusty, aka the Trivial Patch Monkey. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/