Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758116Ab2ERQHx (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 12:07:53 -0400 Received: from smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.46]:43570 "HELO smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757808Ab2ERQHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 12:07:51 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: nO68lC4VM1kvuSLF8umO_iW_jg5cEBwHNXEGhuDFlIIqJOJ JPGC2_z9x6qf2W8CgPKzTxbkH6juDKRdtNb2Oyyq3wkyDCFReE24auslx9T3 hthIK_ltRYuz1Eyb1ieks42qQHs1jRFoQPoETAQMz7BYP_upfQ50wF4iVbiL rUxnFBsoDdr42SBizeR2hrUyslczCk_q6UDdR.Ba.q3iJVmMtJpZYd3oIi5M 1PLDJglatS2pvlZPhNzdByPbSNDmg5DmRaNLBjYIAMbsI_V5JL0jWsSobbls qT.4hqg7zjYULYUvp0b5aPY1v399WiEH9QlAmxAOvDGwS4R8u.jklQDoJ8Me GPbjMg5JgzPSJPDM1XfHsIO0ByM9r5YTsHQEcP3hxnxoXW_Y5q9foeu6HP.M Q.9WAwtnNix0VsxTuWVr4zSeCO_GefCz_0mkS X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:07:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Rik van Riel , mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, pjt@google.com, bharata.rao@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, aarcange@redhat.com, danms@us.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind() In-Reply-To: <1337357041.573.86.camel@twins> Message-ID: References: <4FB66756.2060302@redhat.com> <1337355341.573.68.camel@twins> <1337355610.573.70.camel@twins> <1337356192.573.75.camel@twins> <1337357041.573.86.camel@twins> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 18 On Fri, 18 May 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:00 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Having the page local is a win if there are a sufficient number of > > accesses to amortize the effort to move the page. Given the expensive > > nature of page migration there would need to be a large number of accesses > > to a page to justify the effort. > > Right, but this is true of any migration scheme and not specific to MoF. Yes and the concern about auto migration schemes not improving performance in general applies to all migration schemes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/