Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:13:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:13:39 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:6398 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:13:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.19 revert block_llseek behavior to standard From: Alan Cox To: Phil Auld Cc: viro@math.psu.edu, marcelo@connectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020812123632.E27650@vienna.EGENERA.COM> References: <20020812120659.B27650@vienna.EGENERA.COM> <1029169257.16424.176.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020812123632.E27650@vienna.EGENERA.COM> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 12 Aug 2002 18:14:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1029172448.16424.178.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 613 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 17:36, Phil Auld wrote: > > Political I don't see any. Technical - have you verified each of our > > block drivers behaves correctly when given an offset over its side, and > > that it correctly fails on a 32bit block wrap. > > > > No, but how did it work prior to 2.4.11? Did it work correctly - the answer I believe is - no it didnt. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/