Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932758Ab2EVB62 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 21:58:28 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:42670 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755942Ab2EVB61 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 21:58:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120522013949.GA31883@redhat.com> References: <20120522011152.GA18115@redhat.com> <20120522013949.GA31883@redhat.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:58:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3tncBvcy1jbe43cIU7tcFTJiBU Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3.4+ dcache BUG. To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 18 On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > ? ? ? ?BUG_ON(nd->inode != dentry->d_inode); I'm going to assume it's the exact same thing (and thus hopefully fixed by the revert that I just pushed out), but now I'm really curious what your load is, since you seem to recreate this so easily. I ran with that patch for weeks. But I suspect my issue is that while I tested lots of concurrent lookups, I don't run into low-memory situations. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/