Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:42:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:42:24 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:3076 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:42:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20001217231107.C474@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:11:07 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: recursive exports && linux nfs In-Reply-To: <20001212103652.A13501@cerebro.laendle> <20001215235446.H9506@bug.ucw.cz> <20001217104242.B9034@fuji.laendle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <20001217104242.B9034@fuji.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 10:42:42AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > 2) using: I can do cd /nfs/fs, but the directoy is always empty, and when I > > > try to step into a subdirectory I always get "No such file or directory". > > > > > > Thanks a lot for any insights, even if this means "this is not supported" > > > ;) > > > > This can't be supported, afaict, because nfs handles have limited > > size. > > Ehrm, did you really read my mail? Most people told me something like > "recursive exports are not supported" (actually, they are and they work), > and it seems nobody really read what I wrote :( They do not work too well. They break guarantee that handles are persistent across reboots. Recursive exports are huge kludge. They have to be. [Sorry, I did not read your mail too carefully] > My problem is that autofs doesn't work. Example: > > / reiserfs > /fs autofs > /fs/big ext2 > > When I exportfs /, /fs AND /fs/big then I can mount /fs on another box, > but it is always empty, even if something (e.g. /fs/big) is mounted and > can be accessed fine the whole time. Automounting doesn't work, either, of > course. > > Another (less grave) problem is that exportfs (and/or rpc.nfsd) require > network access and access to the volume, so they a) mount all automounted > directories (VERY expensive) and require network access (making all > clients NOT survive a reboot). > -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/