Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755676Ab2EVNnt (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 09:43:49 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:40370 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505Ab2EVNns (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 09:43:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBB97B2.6050408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:42:10 -0500 From: Seth Jennings User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Minchan Kim CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Dan Magenheimer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Nitin Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: use unsigned long instead of void * References: <1337567013-4741-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <4FBA4EE2.8050308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4FBA4EE2.8050308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12052213-2398-0000-0000-000006D7F892 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1241 Lines: 33 On 05/21/2012 09:19 AM, Seth Jennings wrote: > On 05/20/2012 09:23 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> We should use unsigned long as handle instead of void * to avoid any >> confusion. Without this, users may just treat zs_malloc return value as >> a pointer and try to deference it. > > > I wouldn't have agreed with you about the need for this change as people > should understand a void * to be the address of some data with unknown > structure. > > However, I recently discussed with Dan regarding his RAMster project > where he assumed that the void * would be an address, and as such, > 4-byte aligned. So he has masked two bits into the two LSBs of the > handle for RAMster, which doesn't work with zsmalloc since the handle is > not an address. > > So really we do need to convey as explicitly as possible to the user > that the handle is an _opaque_ value about which no assumption can be made. Wasn't really clear here. All that to say, I think we do need this patch. Thanks, Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/