Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:10:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:10:52 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:27140 "EHLO smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:10:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:13:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Tom Rini cc: Kai Germaschewski , Greg Banks , Peter Samuelson , , Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements In-Reply-To: <20020812214032.GD20176@opus.bloom.county> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1000 Lines: 25 Hi, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > > More examples of the cml1 limitations can be found in arch/ppc/config.in - > > a single choice statement needs to be splitted into multiple choice > > statements. > > Er, which are you referring to here? All of the choice statements are > done for clarity here. :) Tho I was (and have been) pondering creating > arch/ppc/platforms/Config-[468]xx.in, which would rather nicely move all > of the options related to IBM 4xx processors to one file, Motorola 8xx > to another, and general PPC's nicely. There is still a bit of overlap. Roughly it's possible to sort the machine types by cpu type, but IMO it's not the best solution. I think it would be better to sort them by general machine type. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/