Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759027Ab2EVPGQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 11:06:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54249 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756671Ab2EVPGO (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 11:06:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:06:06 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Tao Ma Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC] block/throttle: Add IO throttled information in blkcg. Message-ID: <20120522150606.GH3045@redhat.com> References: <1337674236-2896-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <20120522111111.GE3045@redhat.com> <4FBBA63B.1090401@tao.ma> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FBBA63B.1090401@tao.ma> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2515 Lines: 52 On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:44:11PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > Hi Vivek, > Thanks for the quick response. > On 05/22/2012 07:11 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:10:36PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > >> From: Tao Ma > >> > >> Currently, if the IO is throttled by io-throttle, the SA has no idea of > >> the situation and can't report it to the real application user about > >> that he/she has to do something. So this patch adds a new interface > >> named blkio.throttle.io_throttled which indicates how many IOs are > >> currently throttled. > > > > If the only purpose is to know whether IOs are being throttled, why > > not just scan for the rules and see if respective device has any > > throttling rules or not. > Sorry, but setting a throttling rules doesn't mean the IOs are > throttled, right? So scanning doesn't work here IMHO. It means IOs will be throttled if you cross a certain rate. But yes, it does not give any information that if at time T if there are any bios throttled in the queue or not. > > > > Even if you introduce this interface, you will end up scanning for > > throttled ios against that particular device. And if IO is not happening > > at that moment or if IO rate is not exceeding the rate limit, there > > might not be any throttled ios and one might get misled. > Oh, no actually in a *clound computing* environment, it is really > useful, not misled. So let me describe it in more detail. Our product > system will limit every instance to an approximate number at first, and > then watch out the IOs being throttled. If these numbers is high, it can: > 1) Shout loudly to the application programmer about the abuse if he > sends out too much IO requests. > 2) If it is not too much and some other instances are not active, adjust > the throttled ratio so that this instance can work much faster. Ok, so you want to use this more as "congestion" parameter which tells at a given moment how busy the queue is, or in this instance how many IOs are backlogged in a cgroup due to throttling limits. I guess, it is not a bad idea to export this stat then. Will "blkio.throttle.queued" be a better name to reflect that how many bios are currently queued in throttling layer of request queue. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/