Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932414Ab2EVUJF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 16:09:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56504 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932320Ab2EVUJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 16:09:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:08:59 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Tao Ma Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC] block/throttle: Add IO throttled information in blkcg. Message-ID: <20120522200859.GA10211@redhat.com> References: <1337674236-2896-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <20120522111111.GE3045@redhat.com> <4FBBA63B.1090401@tao.ma> <20120522150606.GH3045@redhat.com> <4FBBAD6F.6020004@tao.ma> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FBBAD6F.6020004@tao.ma> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3889 Lines: 80 On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:14:55PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > On 05/22/2012 11:06 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:44:11PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > >> Hi Vivek, > >> Thanks for the quick response. > >> On 05/22/2012 07:11 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:10:36PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > >>>> From: Tao Ma > >>>> > >>>> Currently, if the IO is throttled by io-throttle, the SA has no idea of > >>>> the situation and can't report it to the real application user about > >>>> that he/she has to do something. So this patch adds a new interface > >>>> named blkio.throttle.io_throttled which indicates how many IOs are > >>>> currently throttled. > >>> > >>> If the only purpose is to know whether IOs are being throttled, why > >>> not just scan for the rules and see if respective device has any > >>> throttling rules or not. > >> Sorry, but setting a throttling rules doesn't mean the IOs are > >> throttled, right? So scanning doesn't work here IMHO. > > > > It means IOs will be throttled if you cross a certain rate. But yes, it > > does not give any information that if at time T if there are any bios > > throttled in the queue or not. > > > >>> > >>> Even if you introduce this interface, you will end up scanning for > >>> throttled ios against that particular device. And if IO is not happening > >>> at that moment or if IO rate is not exceeding the rate limit, there > >>> might not be any throttled ios and one might get misled. > >> Oh, no actually in a *clound computing* environment, it is really > >> useful, not misled. So let me describe it in more detail. Our product > >> system will limit every instance to an approximate number at first, and > >> then watch out the IOs being throttled. If these numbers is high, it can: > >> 1) Shout loudly to the application programmer about the abuse if he > >> sends out too much IO requests. > >> 2) If it is not too much and some other instances are not active, adjust > >> the throttled ratio so that this instance can work much faster. > > > > Ok, so you want to use this more as "congestion" parameter which tells at > > a given moment how busy the queue is, or in this instance how many IOs > > are backlogged in a cgroup due to throttling limits. > yeah, with this information the daemon can adjust these limits > automatically. I am hoping that this daemon will monitor the file for long periods and will not reach to bursty traffic from application. > > > > I guess, it is not a bad idea to export this stat then. Will > > "blkio.throttle.queued" be a better name to reflect that how many bios > > are currently queued in throttling layer of request queue. > I have thought of this name at the very first time. But there is also > another one named "blkio.queued" which indicated the IOs being queued in > the scheduler. I don't want the user to be confused and that's the > reason I use "blkio.throttle.io_throttled". Actually it is blkio.io_queued which shows number of requests queued in CFQ in that cgroup. CFQ and throttling are two different policies and they have separate files in cgroup. Ideally blkio.io_queued should have been blkio.cfq.io_queued but initially it did not occur to me that I should qualify these files with policy name. Later when throttling policy came along, then I qualified new files with policy name. blkio.throttle.*. In summary, blkio.io_queued gives stats of io queued at CFQ level. So it makes sense to create blkio.throttle.io_queued which tells how many bios are currently throttled and queued in throttling layer in this request queue from this cgroup. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/