Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753720Ab2EWCVi (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 22:21:38 -0400 Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.55]:56501 "HELO oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750974Ab2EWCVg (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 22:21:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBC49AB.1060702@tao.ma> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:21:31 +0800 From: Tao Ma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Goyal CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC] block/throttle: Add IO throttled information in blkcg. References: <1337674236-2896-1-git-send-email-tm@tao.ma> <20120522111111.GE3045@redhat.com> <4FBBA63B.1090401@tao.ma> <20120522150606.GH3045@redhat.com> <4FBBAD6F.6020004@tao.ma> <20120522200859.GA10211@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120522200859.GA10211@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1390:box585.bluehost.com:colyli:tao.ma} {sentby:smtp auth 182.92.247.2 authed with tm@tao.ma} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4062 Lines: 86 On 05/23/2012 04:08 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:14:55PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >> On 05/22/2012 11:06 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:44:11PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >>>> Hi Vivek, >>>> Thanks for the quick response. >>>> On 05/22/2012 07:11 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:10:36PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >>>>>> From: Tao Ma >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, if the IO is throttled by io-throttle, the SA has no idea of >>>>>> the situation and can't report it to the real application user about >>>>>> that he/she has to do something. So this patch adds a new interface >>>>>> named blkio.throttle.io_throttled which indicates how many IOs are >>>>>> currently throttled. >>>>> >>>>> If the only purpose is to know whether IOs are being throttled, why >>>>> not just scan for the rules and see if respective device has any >>>>> throttling rules or not. >>>> Sorry, but setting a throttling rules doesn't mean the IOs are >>>> throttled, right? So scanning doesn't work here IMHO. >>> >>> It means IOs will be throttled if you cross a certain rate. But yes, it >>> does not give any information that if at time T if there are any bios >>> throttled in the queue or not. >>> >>>>> >>>>> Even if you introduce this interface, you will end up scanning for >>>>> throttled ios against that particular device. And if IO is not happening >>>>> at that moment or if IO rate is not exceeding the rate limit, there >>>>> might not be any throttled ios and one might get misled. >>>> Oh, no actually in a *clound computing* environment, it is really >>>> useful, not misled. So let me describe it in more detail. Our product >>>> system will limit every instance to an approximate number at first, and >>>> then watch out the IOs being throttled. If these numbers is high, it can: >>>> 1) Shout loudly to the application programmer about the abuse if he >>>> sends out too much IO requests. >>>> 2) If it is not too much and some other instances are not active, adjust >>>> the throttled ratio so that this instance can work much faster. >>> >>> Ok, so you want to use this more as "congestion" parameter which tells at >>> a given moment how busy the queue is, or in this instance how many IOs >>> are backlogged in a cgroup due to throttling limits. >> yeah, with this information the daemon can adjust these limits >> automatically. > > I am hoping that this daemon will monitor the file for long periods and > will not reach to bursty traffic from application. > >>> >>> I guess, it is not a bad idea to export this stat then. Will >>> "blkio.throttle.queued" be a better name to reflect that how many bios >>> are currently queued in throttling layer of request queue. >> I have thought of this name at the very first time. But there is also >> another one named "blkio.queued" which indicated the IOs being queued in >> the scheduler. I don't want the user to be confused and that's the >> reason I use "blkio.throttle.io_throttled". > > Actually it is blkio.io_queued which shows number of requests queued in > CFQ in that cgroup. > > CFQ and throttling are two different policies and they have separate > files in cgroup. Ideally blkio.io_queued should have been > blkio.cfq.io_queued but initially it did not occur to me that I should > qualify these files with policy name. > > Later when throttling policy came along, then I qualified new files with > policy name. blkio.throttle.*. > > In summary, blkio.io_queued gives stats of io queued at CFQ level. So it > makes sense to create blkio.throttle.io_queued which tells how many > bios are currently throttled and queued in throttling layer in this > request queue from this cgroup. OK, I am fine with any name actually. ;) I will use it in the v2. Thanks Tao > > Thanks > Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/