Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:08:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:08:51 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.99.138]:4253 "EHLO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:08:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:12:44 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: lkml , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdrom sane fallback vs 2.4.20-pre1 Message-ID: <20020813041243.GA23433@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml , Jens Axboe References: <20020811215914.GC27048@codepoet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-rmk7, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel StrongARM 110 rev 3), 185.95 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 44 On Mon Aug 12, 2002 at 11:58:26PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Erik Andersen wrote: > > > --- drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c~ Sun Aug 11 15:37:20 2002 > > +++ drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c Sun Aug 11 15:37:24 2002 > > @@ -1916,6 +1916,7 @@ > > { > > struct cdrom_device_ops *cdo = cdi->ops; > > struct cdrom_generic_command cgc; > > + struct request_sense sense; > > kdev_t dev = cdi->dev; > > char buffer[32]; > > int ret = 0; > > @@ -1951,9 +1952,11 @@ > > cgc.buffer = (char *) kmalloc(blocksize, GFP_KERNEL); > > if (cgc.buffer == NULL) > > return -ENOMEM; > > + memset(&sense, 0, sizeof(sense)); > > + cgc.sense = &sense; > > cgc.data_direction = CGC_DATA_READ; > > ret = cdrom_read_block(cdi, &cgc, lba, 1, format, blocksize); > > - if (ret) { > > + if (ret && sense.sense_key==0x05 && sense.asc==0x20 && sense.ascq==0x00) { > > Do you really need to hardcode this values ? This allows it to falls back to READ_10 only when the drive reports "Hey! You gave me an invalid command!" which is the one and only case when a fall back to READ_10 is appropriate. I am not aware of any other reason for which a fallback to READ_10 is useful. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/