Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933395Ab2EWKmJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 06:42:09 -0400 Received: from smtp3.mundo-r.com ([212.51.32.191]:49017 "EHLO smtp4.mundo-r.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757395Ab2EWKmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 06:42:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoQJAOa9vE9bdWOb/2dsb2JhbABDhS+mViKICYEHghUBAQUjVhALGCoCAlcGiCWncZJ1iw+ELIEUA6UMgmw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,644,1330902000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="518546134" Message-ID: <1337769731.3666.8.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: ipack: fix failure registering an ipack device From: Samuel Iglesias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gons=E1lvez?= To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:42:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120523104115.GL4637@mwanda> References: <1337764395-23200-1-git-send-email-siglesias@igalia.com> <1337764395-23200-2-git-send-email-siglesias@igalia.com> <20120523104115.GL4637@mwanda> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HqFLMZdbBPSpfqaSuO9Z" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1816 Lines: 55 --=-HqFLMZdbBPSpfqaSuO9Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote= : > > Trying to install an ipack device it always failed in the match() funct= ion. This > > patch fixes all the bugs present there. > >=20 >=20 > This looks like part of it is undoing stuff introduced in > [patch 1/3]? I was going to ask what the stuff was in 1/3 and then > it got removed which makes me wonder why even more. Could you write > something about why in your changelog? Or if it's not needed then > remove it from the first patch. >=20 > Really it would be easier to review if you broke it up into one > patch per bug, with a description of what the bugs were instead of > "patch fixes all the bugs present there". >=20 > Some of these changes don't seem necessary. It feels like you were > debugging and then when you got match() to work you just committed > all the changes instead of only the lines which are needed. >=20 Yes, you are right. I will work again on these patches. Thanks, Sam --=-HqFLMZdbBPSpfqaSuO9Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+8vwMACgkQWrfbyfmd9eJ5PQCgrTpvUOeCPkPmdjdPWKBORmeI 2V4AoICCQBsW7gdAS/lanaSt43Hvfa/b =i5kp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HqFLMZdbBPSpfqaSuO9Z-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/