Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760325Ab2EWQKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 12:10:43 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38115 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754851Ab2EWQKm (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 12:10:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mce] x86/bitops: Move BIT_64() for a wider use From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, frank.arnold@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, borislav.petkov@amd.com Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1337684026-19740-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:10:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1337789429.9783.16.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 424 Lines: 12 On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:07 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote: > +#define BIT_64(n) (U64_C(1) << (n)) Because writing 1ULL << n is too much work? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/