Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315260AbSHMMXg>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:23:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315266AbSHMMXg>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:23:36 -0400
Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:6392 "EHLO
	irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S315260AbSHMMXg>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:23:36 -0400
Subject: Re: TUX in 2.4.20?
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200208131339.31547.roy@karlsbakk.net>
References: <200208131339.31547.roy@karlsbakk.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) 
Date: 13 Aug 2002 13:24:32 +0100
Message-Id: <1029241472.20980.31.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 495
Lines: 15

On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:39, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
> 
> perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive 2.4.20 
> would be a nice time to do this.
> 
> anyone?

Tux is invasive. It isnt a clean simple patching job. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/