Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:28:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:28:28 -0400 Received: from employees.nextframe.net ([212.169.100.200]:49402 "EHLO sexything.nextframe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:28:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:46:16 +0200 From: Morten Helgesen To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 115 Message-ID: <20020813154616.E2098@sexything> Reply-To: morten.helgesen@nextframe.net References: <200208131314.GAA00444@baldur.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208131314.GAA00444@baldur.yggdrasil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.0 X-Keyboard: PFU Happy Hacking Keyboard X-Operating-System: Slackware Linux (of course) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2438 Lines: 70 On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:14:30AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote: > >>> = Marcin Dalecki > >> = Jens Axboe > > = Marcin Dalecki > > >>> Oh, I realize I didn't express myself properly. I certinaly don't intend > >>> to eliminate elv_add_request() itself any time soon ;-). > > >> No, I would appreciate it if you would keep your hands out of the block > >> code. > > >OK. I have enough. > > I have confirmed by email with Jens (cc'ed to Martin) that > Jens did not mean that Martin should step down as IDE maintainer > or anything like that. Was there any reason to think Jens actually wanted Martin to step down ? He clearly stated that he wanted Martin to keep his hands off the block code - not the IDE code. > > Jens was referring to the generic block code that he > maintains (including elv_add_request and drivers/block/block_ioctl.c, > which Martin had submitted patch for in IDE 115 without consulting > with Jens). > Of course - no wonder it pisses him off :) > Personally, I hope that Martin stays on as IDE maintainer. > Getting IDE to a maintainable state was a minefield that had to > be crossed. Could someone else have done with fewer mistakes? > Maybe, but there was plenty of time for someone else to do it, > and nobody stepped up to the plate. Of course there is a I agree with you - there`s no point discussing whether or not someone else would have been able to do what Martin has done with fewer mistakes - I think we should focus on helping Martin make 2.5 IDE stable ... > trade-off point that point is more conservatively set with the > software that controls disk storage, but, in general, I think > it's important to be supportive of those who actually produce. yeah! > > Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road > adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035 > +1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America > "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." == Morten -- "Livet er ikke for nybegynnere" - sitat fra en klok person. mvh Morten Helgesen UNIX System Administrator & C Developer Nextframe AS admin@nextframe.net / 93445641 http://www.nextframe.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/