Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965167Ab2EXTwV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 15:52:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62782 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932869Ab2EXTwT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 15:52:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:52:02 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, bharrosh@panasas.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, sage@newdream.net, yehuda@hq.newdream.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] block: Kill bi_destructor Message-ID: <20120524195202.GG27550@redhat.com> References: <1337817771-25038-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1337817771-25038-9-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1337817771-25038-9-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1252 Lines: 36 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:45PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: [..] > @@ -234,6 +234,13 @@ void bio_free(struct bio *bio, struct bio_set *bs) > { > void *p; > > + if (!bs) { > + if (bio_integrity(bio)) > + bio_integrity_free(bio, fs_bio_set); > + kfree(bio); > + return; > + } > + Ok, this seems to be the code which will take care of freeing kmalloced bio. I think putting little comment about the explicit assumption is not a bad idea. Somehow we need to integrate two patches so that we don't have memory leak in bisection and reading code becomes easier. Also then what's the need of bio_reset() in previous patch. That seems to be independent from getting rid of pkt_bio_destructor(). I would think that keep we can split the patch and keep bio_reset() logic in a separate patch. In fact I am not even sure that for one driver we should introduce bio_reset() in generic block layer. So to me we should get rid of bio_reset() and let all the gory details remain in driver. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/