Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964820Ab2EYAbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 20:31:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:51869 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759425Ab2EYAbR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 20:31:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:31:14 -0700 From: Kent Overstreet To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, bharrosh@panasas.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, sage@newdream.net, yehuda@hq.newdream.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc() Message-ID: <20120525003114.GF22664@google.com> References: <1337817771-25038-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1337817771-25038-5-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20120524185919.GE27550@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120524185919.GE27550@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 39 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:59:19PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > [..] > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c > > index 013c7a5..5a953c6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c > > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next, > > } > > > > while (old_chain && (total < len)) { > > - tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs); > > + tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask); > > if (!tmp) > > goto err_out; > > > > @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next, > > if (!bp) > > goto err_out; > > > > - __bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1); > > - > > *next = &bp->bio2; > > Is this code correct. Now original code might clone bio after split and > new code will clone the original bio itself and not the split one? Argh, you're right, I screwed that up. I'd like to get rid of all the open coded bio_clone()s out there (to reduce the amount of code that "Only clone bio vecs that are in use" has to change, but this code is too tricky - I'm just going to drop this bit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/