Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932533Ab2EYCKT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 22:10:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59948 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220Ab2EYCKR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2012 22:10:17 -0400 From: Asias He To: Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Asias He Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix lock unbalance caused by lock disconnect Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:10:59 +0800 Message-Id: <1337911859-22913-1-git-send-email-asias@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3944 Lines: 101 Commit 777eb1bf15b8532c396821774bf6451e563438f5 disconnects externally supplied queue_lock before blk_drain_queue(). This would introduce lock unbalance because theads which have taken the external lock might unlock the internal lock in the during the queue drain. This patch fixes this by disconnecting the lock after the queue drain. ===================================== [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] 3.4.0+ #288 Not tainted ------------------------------------- fio/17706 is trying to release lock (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock) at: [] blk_queue_bio+0x2a2/0x380 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by fio/17706: #0: (&(&vblk->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [] get_request_wait+0x19a/0x250 stack backtrace: Pid: 17706, comm: fio Not tainted 3.4.0+ #288 Call Trace: [] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2a2/0x380 [] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xf9/0x100 [] lock_release_non_nested+0x1df/0x330 [] ? dio_bio_end_aio+0x34/0xc0 [] ? bio_check_pages_dirty+0x85/0xe0 [] ? dio_bio_end_aio+0xb1/0xc0 [] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2a2/0x380 [] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2a2/0x380 [] lock_release+0xd9/0x250 [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x23/0x40 [] blk_queue_bio+0x2a2/0x380 [] generic_make_request+0xca/0x100 [] submit_bio+0x76/0xf0 [] ? set_page_dirty_lock+0x3c/0x60 [] ? bio_set_pages_dirty+0x51/0x70 [] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0xbf8/0xee0 [] ? blkdev_get_block+0x80/0x80 [] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x55/0x60 [] ? blkdev_get_block+0x80/0x80 [] blkdev_direct_IO+0x57/0x60 [] ? blkdev_get_block+0x80/0x80 [] generic_file_aio_read+0x70e/0x760 [] ? __lock_acquire+0x215/0x5a0 [] ? aio_run_iocb+0x54/0x1a0 [] ? grab_cache_page_nowait+0xc0/0xc0 [] aio_rw_vect_retry+0x7c/0x1e0 [] ? aio_fsync+0x30/0x30 [] aio_run_iocb+0x66/0x1a0 [] do_io_submit+0x6f0/0xb80 [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [] sys_io_submit+0x10/0x20 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: Asias He --- block/blk-core.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c index 1f61b74..7b4f6fe 100644 --- a/block/blk-core.c +++ b/block/blk-core.c @@ -416,15 +416,10 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q) /* mark @q DEAD, no new request or merges will be allowed afterwards */ mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock); queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q); - spin_lock_irq(lock); queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, q); queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NOXMERGES, q); queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q); - - if (q->queue_lock != &q->__queue_lock) - q->queue_lock = &q->__queue_lock; - spin_unlock_irq(lock); mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock); @@ -440,6 +435,11 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q) del_timer_sync(&q->backing_dev_info.laptop_mode_wb_timer); blk_sync_queue(q); + spin_lock_irq(lock); + if (q->queue_lock != &q->__queue_lock) + q->queue_lock = &q->__queue_lock; + spin_unlock_irq(lock); + /* @q is and will stay empty, shutdown and put */ blk_put_queue(q); } -- 1.7.10.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/