Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:15:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:15:10 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:62200 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:15:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:15:53 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Alan Cox cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Hohnbaum , Greg KH Subject: Re: [patch] PCI Cleanup Message-ID: <1850510493.1029226552@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <1029250668.22847.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1029250668.22847.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 21 > I pointed out before the null check was flawed. And all I see is the > same identical patch churned out again. Regardless of whether that > paticular stupid error was in the old code, not fixing it in the new > code when its pointed out is a bit of a mess. > > I'm not sure its a simplification either. More function pointers don't > always make for neater - but thats a side issue. If the NULL check goes > I'm not too worried about the other stuff. OK, that's easily disposed of, and it'll remove even more lines of redundant code. Thanks, M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/