Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:40:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:40:25 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:57610 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:40:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:44:15 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0 Message-ID: <20020813164415.A11554@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 05:09:03PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 21 On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 05:09:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > the attached patch implements a new syscall on x86, clone_startup(). > The parameters are: > > clone_startup(fn, child_stack, flags, tls_desc, pid_addr) First the name souns horrible. What about spawn_thread or create_thread instead? it's not our good old clone and not a lookalike, it's some pthreadish monster.. > with the help of this syscall glibc's next-generation pthreads code have you discussed this code with IBM's pthread group? I think we don't want to add a new syscall that is only useful to glibc.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/