Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754450Ab2EYOeu (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2012 10:34:50 -0400 Received: from smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.92]:30046 "HELO smtp109.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751808Ab2EYOet (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2012 10:34:49 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: o9qWe0IVM1lMW5Dyvr.gMsB_pnmA.X0oLZBQfGKjOikFEDe de7PGtAUKg0zzsGeb4ZJfGmXoOGkykLrNwkFnWD13BTKy3kwRkRSLk6AhdxA l_n3pfrFrItfQMfZ8thAnaPNucf_a9FBcb1ZkMVv42n1SXmGAEmZU68A5qdI qudi1sBqBITJEXvXd79AIIBGi6Mzh3LA9mpBWYrHlJl0NLMUlba5g92PFFSh iR39EJA7MNsXCt2dRz9zl4aylSCX2Y.UTSJckUop02b8BKTHgJ6dbZjRNCYX 9XGu1ejy3.sl.YLn9lSFNqlT2DOIz6BxKF18RL4Q4X9BgHdfBJsvbkqnYgzV tRYeOrYPVarW0nmS6QaEc0_gaYL0Dq5PAghTwb2kNM0pc2cWmnibCC5QxzBI c X-Yahoo-SMTP: _Dag8S.swBC1p4FJKLCXbs8NQzyse1SYSgnAbY0- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:34:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@router.home To: Michal Hocko cc: Glauber Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Greg Thelen , Suleiman Souhlal , Johannes Weiner , devel@openvz.org, David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] kmem limitation for memcg In-Reply-To: <20120525133441.GB30527@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1337951028-3427-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120525133441.GB30527@tiehlicka.suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1032 Lines: 22 On Fri, 25 May 2012, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 25-05-12 17:03:20, Glauber Costa wrote: > > I believe some of the early patches here are already in some trees around. > > I don't know who should pick this, so if everyone agrees with what's in here, > > please just ack them and tell me which tree I should aim for (-mm? Hocko's?) > > and I'll rebase it. > > memcg-devel tree is only to make development easier. Everything that > applies on top of this tree should be applicable to both -mm and > linux-next. > So the patches should go via traditional Andrew's channel. It would be best to merge these with my patchset to extract common code from the allocators. The modifications of individual slab allocators would then be not necessary anymore and it would save us a lot of work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/