Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:31:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:31:29 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:56329 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:31:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 21:58:32 -0600 To: ferret@phonewave.net Cc: Ingo Oeser , Petr Vandrovec , Dana Lacoste , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux Message-ID: <20001217215831.V3199@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <14908.29798.413845.663365@wire.cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ferret@phonewave.net on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 12:08:35PM -0800 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ferret@phonewave.net] > One last question: WHY is the kernel's top-level Makefile handling > this symlink? Where do you think it should be handled? 'make modules_install' seems like the most logical place, to me. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/