Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:10:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:10:18 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-021-187.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.21.187]:38071 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:10:17 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: large page patch (fwd) (fwd) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:12:04 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Rob Landley , Alan Cox , Larry McVoy , , , David Mosberger , "David S. Miller" , , , William Lee Irwin III , References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 922 Lines: 25 On Tuesday 13 August 2002 19:55, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > Having a license that explicitly states that people who > > contribute and use Linux shouldn't sue you over it might > > prevent some problems. > > The thing is, if you own the patent, and you sneaked the code into the > kernel, you will almost certainly be laughed out of court for trying to > enforce it. > > And if somebody else owns the patent, no amount of copyright license makes > any difference. I don't think that's correct. SGI needs to use and distribute Linux more than they need to enforce their reverse mapping patents against Linux users. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/