Message-ID: <4FC3A768.3060208@antcom.de>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:27:20 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Organization: ANTCOM Open Source Research and Development
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: alan@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/of-serial: Add 16654 chip to compatible string
 list
References: <1338199134-23885-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120528100338.GI24149@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4FC35F97.2030400@antcom.de> <20120528150311.GA28290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20120528150311.GA28290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1429
Lines: 34

On 28/05/12 17:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> Initially, with my RFC patch, there was an #ifdef for bigger FIFO in
>> case of LPC32xx where we have a 16550A variant with 64 byte fifos.
> 
> What are all the differences?  Is it just a larger FIFO?

Yes, this is how it's summarized in the manual (LPC32xx SoC).

>> So maybe 16750 is the better choice for me, anyway. Already supported in
>> of-serial. Works for now, but need more testing. Another hint is that
>> 16750 is advertised as "IP core for Soc" which matches the case of LPC32xx.
> 
> 16750 also has automatic hardware flow control support, selectable through
> bit 5 in the MCR register.  If your UART has that, then it's probably a
> 16750 derivative rather than a 16550 or 16650 derivative.
> 
> 16650s have an EFR register at offset 2, selectable by writing 0xBF into
> the LCR register, which the 16750 doesn't have.  16650 also has automatic
> hardware flow control, bit this is selected through a couple of bits in
> the EFR.

The 4 LPC32xx's "Standard" UARTs have neither of those.

Is it ok to use "ns16650", i.e. PORT_16650, or do I need to introduce a
FIFO depth configuration?

Thanks in advance,

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/