Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:15:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:15:24 -0400 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:10186 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:15:23 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15705.27073.997831.983519@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:19:13 -0700 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0 In-Reply-To: References: <20020813160924.GA3821@codepoet.org> <20020813171138.A12546@infradead.org> <15705.13490.713278.815154@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 18 >>>>> On 13 Aug 2002 12:52:11 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" said: >> The clone() system call cannot be used by portable applications >> *AT ALL*, since it inherently needs a user-space assembly >> wrapper. It's just a matter of how you define the interface to >> the assembly wrapper. The function call issue is a separate question though. If you want to argue that the libc clone() wrapper is broken, fine by me. (BTW: wasn't that you who complained about platform-specific Linux syscalls recently? ;-) --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/