Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752016Ab2E2Ho5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2012 03:44:57 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:53080 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868Ab2E2Hoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2012 03:44:55 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.4.0 Message-ID: <4FC47E88.2000403@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:45:12 +0900 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Patch] x86 : set numa_nodes_parsed at acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2222 Lines: 54 When hot-adding a CPU into my system, the system showed following message since node_to_cpumask_map[2] was not allocated memory. Booting Node 2 Processor 32 APIC 0xc0 node_to_cpumask_map[2] NULL Pid: 0, comm: swapper/32 Tainted: G A 3.3.5-acd #21 Call Trace: [] debug_cpumask_set_cpu+0x155/0x160 [] ? add_timer_on+0xaa/0x120 [] numa_add_cpu+0x1e/0x22 [] identify_cpu+0x1df/0x1e4 [] identify_econdary_cpu+0x16/0x1d [] smp_store_cpu_info+0x3c/0x3e [] smp_callin+0x139/0x1be [] start_secondary+0x13/0xeb In my investigation, the root cause is that the bit of node 2 was not set at numa_nodes_parsed since hot-added cpu was not written in ACPI SRAT Table. But hot-added memory which is same PXM as the cpu is written in here. ACPI Spec Rev 5.0 says about ACPI SRAT talbe as follows: This optional table provides information that allows OSPM to associate processors and memory ranges, including ranges of memory provided by hot-added memory devices, with system localities / proximity domains and clock domains. So I think the ACPI SRAT Table is not wrong. Thus numa_nodes_parsed should be set by not only acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init / acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init but also acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init for the case. Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu --- arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Index: linux-3.4/arch/x86/mm/srat.c =================================================================== --- linux-3.4.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat.c 2012-05-21 07:29:13.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-3.4/arch/x86/mm/srat.c 2012-05-29 05:28:27.353916902 +0900 @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct ac return; } + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); + printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: Node %u PXM %u %Lx-%Lx\n", node, pxm, start, end); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/