Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:48:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:48:35 -0400 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:28613 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:48:28 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15705.29059.306202.720523@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:52:19 -0700 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0 In-Reply-To: <3D596B96.4000305@zytor.com> References: <20020813160924.GA3821@codepoet.org> <20020813171138.A12546@infradead.org> <15705.13490.713278.815154@napali.hpl.hp.com> <15705.27073.997831.983519@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3D596B96.4000305@zytor.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 19 >>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:27:02 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" said: >> I was, however, the flaws that you complained of had nothing to >> do with the syscall -- it's all in the syscall wrapper (which is >> required for clone(), like it or not.) The issue is not whether a wrapper is needed or not. My point is that it is cleaner to always describe stack areas as memory areas (e.g., as a base/size pair). Note that this is effectively what's happening in the platform-independent part of the kernel today. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/