Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:42:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:42:09 -0400 Received: from khms.westfalen.de ([62.153.201.243]:1703 "EHLO khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:42:08 -0400 Date: 13 Aug 2002 22:35:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8UmO4N5mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0 X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh10 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? References: <20020813160924.GA3821@codepoet.org> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 24 mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar) wrote on 13.08.02 in : > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Erik Andersen wrote: > > > > First the name souns horrible. What about spawn_thread or create_thread > > > instead? it's not our good old clone and not a lookalike, it's some > > > pthreadish monster.. > > > > How about "clone2"? > > ni fact it was sys_clone2() first time around, but Ulrich Drepper > requested another name for it because in glibc it collided with ia64 where > clone2() is something different. So whatever name there is going to be, it > should not be sys_clone2(). clone_and_start() or clone_and_go() or something along those lines, perhaps? MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/