Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:18:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:18:58 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:17379 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:18:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:22:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1093 Lines: 41 On 13 Aug 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >... > > > Because the compiler sees: > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < N; i++) > > > ; > > > > > > and it says "ah ha. A busy wait delay loop" and leaves it alone. > > > > > > It's actually a special-case inside the compiler to not optimise > > > away such constructs. > > > > Why is this a special case? As long as a compiler can't prove that the > > computed value of i isn't used later it mustn't optimize it away. > > Bullsh*t. It can legitimately transform it into: > > i = N; >... Ah, my misunderstanding: "optimize away" didn't mean "completely remove it" but "transform it to something semantically equivalent". > -hpa Thanks Adrian -- You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/